The recent report by Shamim, et al. [1] brings out the most
common and continued problem encountered in pediatric intensive care
units. Research has proved that using isotonic fluids as maintenance
fluids in sick children results in fewer hyponatremic episodes compared
to hypotonic fluids [2,3]. However, there are few issues:
The statistics could have been extended to see how
many children will be harmed if used hypotonic fluids compared to
reduced volume isotonic fluids. The number needed to harm in this trial
(to cause hyponatremia), if using hypotonic fluids, would be 1 in 4 at
24 hours (95% CI 1.9-15.2) and 48 hours (95% CI 1.9-11.8), which is
higher compared to an earlier study [2]. The absolute risk increases by
30 percent if hypotonic fluids are used. However, the earlier trial used
the same volume of fluids in both the participant groups which points
towards a need of reduced volume rather than standard volume maintenance
fluids apart from employing isotonic fluids, to reduce hyponatremia.
The participants in both groups received 1 mL of
potassium chloride per 100 mL of intravenous fluids. The isotonic group
compared to hypotonic group has received lesser potassium maintenance,
as the volume was reduced to 60 percent in this group. However, there
was no hypokalemia in the isotonic group. The potassium maintenance
should have been adjusted so that the both groups received the same
amount of potassium.
The study also had limitation of not measuring the
urine osmolality. The basic principle to prevent hyponatremia in
pediatric intensive care depends on the amount of free water given which
further depends on the solute load (intravenous fluids) and urine
osmolality. During the sickness the vasopressin levels would be high
resulting in high urine osmolality. Hyponatremia can still occur in
children given isotonic fluids at reduced volume which is also seen in
this study.
It is very clear that the maintenance fluids used in
sick children should be isotonic with reduced standard volume to prevent
hyponatremia. How far and how much to reduce depends on the sickness of
the child. If the child is very sick, the fluid reduction should be
higher. In extreme sickness, the question to further reduce maintenance
fluids or to increase the solute concentration in the maintenance fluids
remains unanswered?
References
1. Shamim A, Afzal k, Manzir AS. Safety and efficacy
of isotonic (0.9%) vs. Hypotonic (0.18%) saline as maintenance
intravenous fluids in children: A randomized controlled trial. Indian
Pediatr. 2014;51:969-74.
2. Montanana PA, Modesto AV, Ocon AP, Lopez PO, Lopez
PJL, Toledo PJD. The use of isotonic fluid as maintenance therapy
prevents iatrogenic hyponatremia in pediatrics: a randomized, controlled
open study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:589-97.
3. McNab S, Ware RS, Neville KA, Choong K, Coulthard
MG, Duke TA, et al. Isotonic versus hypotonic solutions for
maintenance intravenous fluid administration in children. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD009457.