1.gif (1892 bytes)                 

Short Communications

Indian Pediatrics 2008; 45: 315-318

Descriptive Epidemiology of Dengue Transmission in Uttar Pradesh

 

Piyush Tripathi, Rashmi Kumar, Sanjeev Tripathi, JJ Tambe and Vimala Venkatesh*

From the Departments of Pediatrics and *Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence to: Prof Rashmi Kumar, Department of Pediatrics, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow (UP), India. E-mail: [email protected]

Manuscript received: April 30, 2007; Initial review completed: June 12, 2007;
Revision accepted: November 29, 2007.

Abstract

We report epidemiology of dengue infection as revealed through a hospital based surveillance for dengue infection over a 3 year period in Lucknow, U.P., India. In 2003-2005, children with acute febrile encephalopathy (AFE) and in 2005-2006, children with acute undifferentiated febrile illness (AUFI) were enrolled. IgM antibodies to dengue were tested by ELISA in acute serum. A total of 118/563 (20.9%) patients tested positive for dengue antibodies. Dengue transmission occurred round the year in the Lucknow region with peak in postmonsoon season and occurred equally in rural and urban areas. All the surrounding districts were affected, with no distinct high prevalence areas.

Key words: Dengue, India, Transmission.

Introduction

During the last decade, more frequent and severe epidemics of dengue have hit several Indian cities. Over the last few years we were engaged in a hospital based surveillance for dengue as part of 2 studies conducted here. A large number of patients were systematically screened for dengue infection. Since both the studies throw light on the epidemiology of dengue, this aspect of both studies is combined here to report the descriptive epidemiology of dengue infection in and around Lucknow.

Methods

The work was based at the Department of Pediatrics, King George Medical University, Lucknow. Over a period of 3 years from 2003 to 2006 we actively looked for indicators of dengue infection in patients presenting with (i) acute febrile encephalopathy (AFE) (2003-2005) and (ii) acute undifferentiated febrile illness (AUFI) (2005-2006) .

AFE study: AFE was defined as fever with altered consciousness of 2 weeks duration or less in a previously well child. In July 2003, we launched a study to define the role of dengue encephalopathy in children presenting with AFE. Consecutive children between 1-12 years of age hospitalized with AFE were screened for dengue infection. Those children with a firm diagnosis of bacterial or tubercular meningitis(1,2) and hepatic encephalopathy were excluded.

AUFI study: In 2005-2006, another study was conducted to examine the importance of dengue fever (DF) as a cause of AUFI among children presenting as outpatients. Consecutive children aged 6 months to 12 years reporting as outpatients on 3 preselected week days and seeking care for the complaint of fever of 15 days or less duration were enrolled in the study if they had no localizing signs of infection.

In both studies, serum was tested for dengue IgM antibodies by antibody capture ELISA using commercial kits (Panbio, Australia) and in some cases in 2003 haemagglutination inhibition (HI) test in paired sera was performed by standard methods(3).

Detailed addresses of the patients were noted down. The residence of the child could be divided into (i) rural or (ii) urban/periurban (amalgamation) areas. Age-sex, rural-urban, districtwise and month-wise distribution of cases was computed. Ethical Approval for both studies was obtained from India-CLEN IRB and KG Medical University Ethics Committee. Verbal consent was obtained from parents.

Results

A total of 265 of 612 patients presenting with AFE were enrolled. Forty nine patients underwent HI test in paired sera and 238 were tested for dengue IgM ELISA. A total of 62 patients were positive for dengue antibodies by either or both tests.

For the AUFI study a total of 298 of 915 patients with fever were enrolled, of which 56 were positive for dengue IgM by ELISA. Thus a total of 118/563 (20.9%) patients seen over 3 years were positive for dengue antibodies. Table I and II show the age-sex and rural-urban distribution of enrolled and dengue positive cases. Figure 1 and 2 shows the monthwise enrollment and Figure 3 shows the districtwise distribution of enrolled and dengue positive cases.

TABLE I  

Age and Sex Distribution of Enrolled and Dengue Antibody Positive Children
Age Enrolled Patients (N=563) Antibody Positive (N=118)
  Male* Female Male* Female
< 2 years 7(70.0) 33(30.0) 22(81.5) 5(18.5)
2-5 years 108(62.4) 65(37.6) 27(75.0) 9(25.0)
> 5 years 182(65.0) 98(35.0) 35(63.6) 20(36.4)
Mean age in months  (SD) 71.3 (40.6) 67.2(41.8)
* Male: Female proportion in enrolled vs. antibody positive children was comparable for all age groups (P>0.05).  
Figures in parentheses indicate percentage. 
TABLE II

Rural Urban Distribution of Enrolled and Dengue Antibody Positive Children
Patient type Enrolled Antibody positive Pvalue*
  Rural* Urban Unclear Rural* Urban Unclear  
Acute febrile encephalopathy 192(72.4) 72(27.2) 1(0.4) 46(74.2) 16(25.8) 0(0) 0.77
Acute undifferentiated febrile illness 75(25.2) 209(70.1) 14(4.7) 17(30.3) 36(64.3) 3(5.3) 0.30
Total 267(47.4) 281(49.9) 15(2.6) 63(53.4) 52(44.1) 3(2.5) 0.14
* Comparison of proportions (rural) between all enrolled and dengue antibody positive subgroup by Chi-square test.

Fig. 1. Monthwise enrollment of cases and dengue antibody positive patients (AFE study).

 


Fig. 2.
Monthwise enrollment of cases and dengue IgM positive patients (AUFI study).

 

1. Muzaffarnagar 36. Balarampur 
2. Bijnor 37. Jalaun  
3. Meerut 38. Sonbhadra
4. Baghpat 39. Hamirpur  
5. Gaziabad 40. Fatehpur  
6. Bulandshahr 41. Rae Barielly  
7. Jyotiba Phule Nagar 42. Sultanpur  
8. Moradabad 43. Faizabad  
9. Rampur 44. Basti  
10. Aligarh 45. Shidhathnagar
11. Budaun 46. Mahoba
12. Barielly 47. Chitrakut
13. Pilibhit 48. Kaushambi
14. Mathura 49. Pratapgarh
15. Hathras 50. Ambedkarnagar
16. Etah 51. Sant Kabir Nagar
17. Shahjahapur 52. Maharajganj
18. Lakhimpur 53. Allahabad
19. Agra 54. Jaunpur
20. Firozabad 55. Azamgarh
21. Mainpuri 56. Gorakhpur
22. Farrukhabad 57. Deoria
23. Hardoi 58. Kushinagar
24. Sitapur 59. Sant Ravi Nagar  
25. Bahraich 60. Mirzapur
26. Etawah 61. Varanasi
27. Kanauj 62. Ghazipur
28. Auriayan 63. Mau
29. Kanpur (Rural) 64. Chandauli
30. Kanpur (Urban) 65. Sonbhadra
31. Unnao 66. Lalitpur  
32. Lucknow 67. Saharanpur
33. Barabanki 68. Gautam Budh Nagar
34. Gonda 69. Banda
35. Shrawasti 70.  Ballia

Fig. 3. District wise distribution of dengue cases (Dengue IgM positive AFE; Dengue IgM negative AFE; Dengue IgM positive AUFI; Dengue IgM negative AUFI, respectively).

Discussion

This hospital based study shows presence of antibodies to dengue in a high proportion of AFE and AUFI patients, indicating active dengue transmission in the study area. Chances of cross-reactions with other flaviviruses are small(4). In the absence of community-based studies, this data may serve as an useful measure of epidemiology of the infection. We did not ask for travel history in our patients and expect that any differences in transmission area caused by recent travel would be minor.

Dengue has traditionally been held to be a disease of high population density tropical urban areas(5,6). The proportion of rural and urban patients among those testing antibody-positive more or less paralleled the rural-urban ratio of enrolled patients indicating that dengue transmission is occurring equally in rural and urban areas. Over the last 1-2 decades there are increasing reports of dengue cases and outbreaks from rural areas in southern and western India(7-15). A single study from north India describes an outbreak of DF in rural Haryana(16). These outbreaks were investigated in a small number of patients with dengue antibody estimations. Ours is the first report in which such a large number of subjects were studied systematically over a period of three calendar years and the first report of dengue from rural Uttar Pradesh. The district-wise distribution showed that dengue occurred uniformly in the catchment area without areas of predilection.

Many factors can be responsible for transmission in rural areas. Uttar Pradesh has a huge population, mostly living in rural areas. Unlike rural areas of other parts of the world, population density here is high. The residential parts of villages are water logged in the rainy season and breeding of the insect vector in water filled containers in and around the rural dwellings is likely.

Contributors: RK conceived the study, wrote the research proposals, supervised data collection and paper writing. PT conducted ELISA tests and wrote the paper. ST conducted HI and ELISA tests. JJT collected clinical data. VV supervised antibody estimations. All authors helped in writing and approving the final draft.

Funding: USAID/INCLEN.

Competing interests: None stated.

 

What this Study Adds

• Dengue transmission occurs equally in both rural and urban areas of Uttar Pradesh; round the year with peak in post monsoon season.
 

References

1. Berkley JA, Versteeg AC, Mwangi I, Lowe BS, Newton CRJC. Indicators of acute bacterial meningitis in children at a rural Kenyan district hospital. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 713-719.

2. Kumar R, Dwivedi A, Kumar P, Kohli N. Tuberculous meningitis in BCG vaccinated and unvaccinated children. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2005; 76: 1550-1554.

3. Clarke DH, Casals J. Techniques for hemaggluti-nation and hemagglutination-inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1958; 7: 561-573.

4. Gubler DJ, Meltzer M. The impact of dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever on the developing world. Adv Virus Res 1999; 53: 35-70.

5. Pavri KM. Ecology of mosquito-borne viruses in India and Southeast Asia. In: Loutit MW, Miles JAR. Eds. Microbial Ecology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1978. p. 175.

6. Teixeira MG, Barreto ML, Costa1 MCN, Denize L, Ferreira A, Vasconcelos PFC, et al. Dynamics of dengue virus circulation: a silent epidemic in a complex urban area. Trop Med Int Health 2002; 7: 757-762.

7. Norman G, Theodre A, Joseph A. An insular outbreak of dengue fever in a rural south Indian village. J Commun Dis 1991; 23: 185-190.

8. Mehendale SM, Risbud AR, Rao JA, Banerjee K. Outbreak of dengue fever in rural areas of Parbhani district of Maharashtra (India). Indian J Med Res 1991; 93: 6-11.

9. Ilkal MA, Dhanda V, Hassan MM, Mavale M, Mahadev PV, Shetty PS, et al. Entomological investigations during outbreaks of dengue fever in certain villages in Maharashtra state. Indian J Med Res 1991; 93: 174-178.

10. Mahadev PV, Kollali VV, Rawal ML, Pujara PK, Shaikh BH, Ilkal MA, et al. Dengue in Gujarat state, India during 1988 and 1989. Indian J Med Res 1993; 97: 135-144.

11. Joshi PT, Pandya AP, Anjan JK. Epidemiological and entomological investigation in dengue outbreak area of Ahmedabad district. J Commun Dis 2000; 32: 22-27.

12. Victor TJ, Malathi M, Gurusamy D, Desai A, Ravi V, Narayanasamy G, et al. Dengue fever outbreaks in two villages of Dharmapuri district in Tamil Nadu. Indian J Med Res 2002; 116: 133-139.

13. Arunachalam N, Murty US, Kabilan L, Bala-subramanian A, Thenmozhi V, Narahari D, et al. Studies on dengue in rural areas of Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh, India. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2004; 20: 87-90.

14. Tewari SC, Thenmozhi V, Katholi CR, Manavalan R, Munirathinam A, Gajanana A. Dengue vector prevalence and virus infection in a rural area in south India. Trop Med Int Health 2004; 9: 499-507.

15. Paramasivan R, Thenmozhi V, Hiriyan J, Dhanan-jeyan KJ, Tyagi BK, Dash AP. Serological and entomological investigations of an outbreak of dengue fever in certain rural areas of Kanyakumari district, Tamil Nadu. Indian J Med Res 2006; 123: 697-701.

16. Kumar A, Sharma SK, Padbidri VS, Thakare JP, Jain DC, Datta KK. An outbreak of dengue fever in rural areas of northern India. J Commun Dis 2001; 33: 274-281.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription